Save the Gippsland Line

gippsland-line-2.jpg

 

Dear Daniel Andrews,

We the citizens and people of Gippsland do not agree with the recommendation that regional train services be terminated at Pakenham and our vulnerable, disabled and elderly be forced to change trains on their journey to Melbourne. Many of these people are the disadvantaged of our community, often seeking medical assistance & appointments in metropolitan medical centres that are not available in our region.

This change would also affect the bike tourists and young families who would also have difficulty with young children, prams and bikes changing trains to and from crowded metropolitan rail. The Gippsland area is being promoted as a great tourist region with economic benefits and as a way of overcoming the demise of the coal and timber mill industry and continual rail service is a must for this to succeed.

Other frequent users of the system are our people who work in the metropolitan centres and choose to live in the regional and rural areas here for the lifestyle and community opportunities that we have. The current system is unreliable and often runs late, this additional transfer and changeover time will add to the already overly long trip and decrease the reliability of the transport system to them, not to mention the additional time needed to be added to the start of the trip, getting up earlier, the changes in timetables that will be required etc.

We understand that the cost of upgrading the metropolitan system is a burden, but can Gippsland at least have the same standard as the other Victorian regions, that our Melbourne trains actually go to Melbourne, as they now do.

The Federal Minister for Infrastructure who is a resident here has promised his support in working with the state government to help sort the congestion problem.

We ask that you do not accept this part of the report from the citizens jury on face value and seek further consultation with the impacted communities and federal counterparts as you work towards an upgrading of the lines to at least the standard that the other Victorian Regions rail systems already have.

 

1,311 SIGNATURES
1,200 signatures

Will you sign?


Showing 949 reactions

  • Amanda Stephenson
    signed 2016-08-08 15:05:41 +1000
  • Jayne Alexander
    signed via 2016-08-08 15:04:45 +1000
  • Annelise Answerth
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 14:59:44 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Emily Jeffrey
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:59:35 +1000
  • Annelise Answerth
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:58:56 +1000
  • Ben Perry
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:55:59 +1000
  • Luke Salmond
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 14:53:48 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Rhonda Blight
    signed 2016-08-08 14:53:39 +1000
  • Jennifer OBrien
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:53:13 +1000
  • Luke Salmond
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:53:13 +1000
    Take my bike down regularly, please keep the train!
  • Madison Morley
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:52:37 +1000
  • Fiona Bott
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:46:01 +1000
  • Steph Kay
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 14:40:09 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Stephanie Kay
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:39:39 +1000
    I use the Traralgon-Melbourne service at least 3 times a month. Mostly to see my family who live in Melbourne and also friends who are attending University in the city. I know it’s not a priority problem, but I feel this would disadvantage me socially with my family and friends who I want to keep in touch with. This change will just mean more time commuting, more time wasted on public transport and less time spent with people I care about most. It’s hard enough to get work off on weekends so I can make time to come up to Melbourne safely, this is disadvantaging lots of Gippslanders for many, many reasons.
  • Paul Crozier
    signed 2016-08-08 14:36:46 +1000
  • Jade Kafrouni
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:35:10 +1000
    University students who attend uni in the city but can’t aford to leave home, so rely on vline
  • Roslyn Furlong
    signed 2016-08-08 14:31:31 +1000
  • Katia Ercoles
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:24:29 +1000
  • Luke McCluskey
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:22:24 +1000
  • Jeremy Allen
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 14:17:12 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Jeremy Allen
    signed via 2016-08-08 14:16:57 +1000
  • Adam Marino
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 14:15:23 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Adam Marino
    signed 2016-08-08 14:14:53 +1000
  • Bob Carter
    signed 2016-08-08 13:55:06 +1000
  • Cymone Perry
    signed 2016-08-08 13:53:03 +1000
    The rail is so vital for the people of Gippsland. Please do not stop it at Pakenham.
  • Michelle Caddy
    signed 2016-08-08 13:45:06 +1000
  • Cleta Sands
    signed 2016-08-08 13:44:52 +1000
    There is no concept or vision for the needs of a thriving community!!!
  • Michelle Bartlett
    posted about this on Facebook 2016-08-08 13:40:25 +1000
    A Melbourne train should go to Melbourne, why does the Gippsland regional line get substandard service recommended?
  • Michelle Bartlett
    signed 2016-08-08 13:40:04 +1000
    It just shows that rurual community’s are not as valued or valuable to the government as the city commuters are.
  • Ruth Agius
    signed via 2016-08-08 13:39:55 +1000